Shipper tendencies
Aug. 22nd, 2005 12:15 pmCan someone explain to me why there's such a compelling need to sexualize and Romantic-ize characters? I've been there myself, but I seem to have gone past that as a "serious" endeavor. I'll *play* with characters and their sexuality -- but the *need* to pair them up romantically just isn't a priority, and it seems so unnecessary, and somewhat Mary Sueish, especially if it's certain types of het and slash writing.
It's not so much the sexualizing -- that I get, it's fun to imagine your favorite characters whupping it up with the whipped cream and cherries, and get down and dirty and sweaty. But at the same time, what I'm puzzled more about is the need to Harlequinnize decent characters who already have complex, nonsexual relationships with each other, that get totally boring when they DO get together.
Anyone?
It's not so much the sexualizing -- that I get, it's fun to imagine your favorite characters whupping it up with the whipped cream and cherries, and get down and dirty and sweaty. But at the same time, what I'm puzzled more about is the need to Harlequinnize decent characters who already have complex, nonsexual relationships with each other, that get totally boring when they DO get together.
Anyone?
no subject
Date: 2005-08-23 02:40 am (UTC)Of course it's subjective. Although, as Grac has pointed out, it's when characters get domesticated and hit with globs of smarm and taken out of the context of their shows (mileau) ... then, what's the point of the shipping? Although that's not exactly the metaquestion that's been bandied about.
Nialla's pointed out that the Romance Genre industry is the largest of all the published genres and mainstream fiction. Heck, I've even got a few Susan Krinards on my bookshelf (she writes incredibly hot [het werewolf] sex). So, there's no denying that it's a huge 900 pound gorilla that wears Rodney Dangerfield's sign on its chest that "I don't get no respect."
So, I don't neccessarily find them *boring* -- just, when it comes to onscreen televised episodic fiction (ie a program like Stargate) is it really necessary to shoehorn in Romance everyway it can be done, so that it's overstuffed and sticking out of the seams? That's on the production side of it.
Perhaps its the overwhelming Disneyfication with the old fairy tales of the Girl Getting her Boy, or the other way around...and, if you look at Stargate specifically, it does have a lot of fairytale parallels. (they aren't that far from mythology, after all)
no subject
Date: 2005-08-23 11:38 am (UTC)I have nothing against romance at all. I am just tired of seeing on Tv and in the movies. Especially when it's not done very well.
But then again, how do we define "well" anyway?