Who else has started hating "will they or won't they" situations on television shows? The Watcher (Mo) who writes for the Chicago Tribune has stated she's dropping Bones from her list of shows to watch and review. The comments to the article are interesting, too.
Profile
gategrrl
Page Summary
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2009-09-21 06:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-21 08:30 pm (UTC)And the writing was never *great*. At least the original characters had been settled and written consistently before the big shake-up, and the established actors had something to work with, if they wanted.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-21 08:49 pm (UTC)No, the writing was never great, but the characters were generally interesting (though technically half of the leads came from the movie) and the actors could really lift things. In later years, even before RDA left, you could tell everyone was getting tired. Their characters became more like them, they didn't have to "act" as their characters, so I didn't "see" their characters very much.
I sometimes wonder if it would be viewed with 20/20 rose-tinted glasses as a better show if it had ended at the end of the Showtime years. Leave things hanging with Daniel out doing the glowy Ascended thing, and not trying to completely change the dynamics again.
Sure, there would have still been people complaining to this day about how it shouldn't have ended then, it could have gone on longer, etc., but I've found I have much better associations with shows that "ended too soon" versus those that didn't.