![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
gategrrlDoes anyone here read Jodi Picoult books? There's a movie coming out soon, starring one of the girls from Medium called My Sister's Keeper that's based on her book of the same name.
I picked the book up for a brief skim while I was waiting in the grocery store for a prescription. In short, the book focuses on "What would happen if a child, who was expressly born to medically assist an older child, grew to the age where she didn't want to be pushed around anymore and go through any more tests, or even donate an organ?"
If I'd bought this damned book, I would have hurled it out the window and added it to my growing imaginary pile of books waiting for a bonfire.
Not because of the subject matter. No. I think the subject matter IS an interesting one. No, it's because I read the final two chapters. And I am glad I did. Let's put it this way, without spoiling anyone who is planning on reading this piece of crap or going to see the movie:
Picoult chickens out at the end of her story. Oh, she takes it to a logical conclusion, and then pulls some Chick Lit twist shit that I find contemptible. She takes the EASY way out. She takes the emotional "heart-wringer" "twist" ending that negates EVERYTHING the title character was fighting for. And this isn't the only time she's pulled this last-minute crap in one of her books. Oh no.
She LOVES to take the easy plot out.
I picked the book up for a brief skim while I was waiting in the grocery store for a prescription. In short, the book focuses on "What would happen if a child, who was expressly born to medically assist an older child, grew to the age where she didn't want to be pushed around anymore and go through any more tests, or even donate an organ?"
If I'd bought this damned book, I would have hurled it out the window and added it to my growing imaginary pile of books waiting for a bonfire.
Not because of the subject matter. No. I think the subject matter IS an interesting one. No, it's because I read the final two chapters. And I am glad I did. Let's put it this way, without spoiling anyone who is planning on reading this piece of crap or going to see the movie:
Picoult chickens out at the end of her story. Oh, she takes it to a logical conclusion, and then pulls some Chick Lit twist shit that I find contemptible. She takes the EASY way out. She takes the emotional "heart-wringer" "twist" ending that negates EVERYTHING the title character was fighting for. And this isn't the only time she's pulled this last-minute crap in one of her books. Oh no.
She LOVES to take the easy plot out.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2010-04-16 01:47 am (UTC)In the movie, Anna gets her emancipation, and Kate dies. I liked that ending better. There's also more empahsis on Sara (the mum) realising she has to let go of Kate. They're both pretty crap in the way they deal with its issues (Sara NEVER says or thinks 'maybe I've done some lousy things to Anna', although there's a few points made that, if she could donate herself, she would) but the movie is slightly better.
The problem, like most of what I've seen of Picoult (yes, I'm a sucker for punishment - she wrote one good book and I kept reading in the hope she had written another good one), she comes up with a good concept and then totally pisses it away with shonky writing and broad stereotyping. Like 'Salem Falls' could have been a good look at humanity's inherent xenophobia or how these girls' sexuality was screwed up 'cos of their unhelathy relationships with their fathers, but instead, we get the 'evil wiccan' trope, and Picoult's trademark 'OMG! someone else did it! end of story!' twist that she thinks is clever.
.