(no subject)
Aug. 21st, 2008 11:05 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It's all over my flist--Atlantis cancelled. After a five year run with a turnstile for the actors and halfway through a new set of producers, it was finally officially canned by SciFi.
Did you really want to continue twisting in the wind with the pallid story-lines, revolving cast, and improbable romantic relationships? Would it *really* be desirable to have it spiral down in quality even *more*?
Did you really want to continue twisting in the wind with the pallid story-lines, revolving cast, and improbable romantic relationships? Would it *really* be desirable to have it spiral down in quality even *more*?
no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 06:27 pm (UTC)So...I will miss it. There are pretty much no shows on now that I really like. Stargate Atlantis was the last one. I have a few other shows that I'm watching, but most of them I don't even like as much as I liked SGA. Well...Robin Hood, but apparently that's been fucked up.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 06:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 06:53 pm (UTC)I suppose it could have improved, but according the producers/writers/staff and suits, it always was improving anyhow with each change and addition and subtraction in front of and behind the camera.
I will miss seeing Robert Picardo on a series again, though. :-(
Hey! Maybe some of these folks will show up on Boston Legal! THAT would rock!
no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 07:05 pm (UTC)Like SG-1 before it, SGA had giant plot holes, poor writing and often wrote characters differently every week. I think part of the reason I liked Rodney was because he was one of the most consistent characters on the show. (Methinks the fact that he's an arrogant ass made it easier for the writers to be consistent with his characterization). Often times the message the show sent about women and minorities were troubling at best. Characters made arbitrary decisions ("Like, Teyla can't go to the mall to look for the father of her soon-to-be born son...because...uh...because we say so!") or don't react with the appropriate weight (Carson!) when they have to do something ethically questionable.*
Yet, somehow I liked it. I think that all the actors and actresses did the best they could with what they had. That helps. It really is something that despite all of that, the show had a good following. There was just something about it. I'm sad to see it go, but I feel rather okay about it, almost relieved.
*Ethically questionable makes good drama, but doing it without thought, reflection or conflict doesn't. I so could have gone with and been cool with Carson's actions and character if we saw him and others debate and agonize over it. Made it hard. Sadly, that didn't happen.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 10:03 pm (UTC)I sort of agree with you there, but I'm curious how far in the planning stage things were. Are they planning to go out shipping characters all to hell and gone now that the end is nigh and there's nothing fans could do about it at this point? Or at least push it as far as they dare, considering there's movies in the pipe.
The ethical points were always something that troubled me with Atlantis. I get the whole, "We're in a war!" thing, but sometimes decisions were made with a reason given (if we were lucky) but no indication it was made after any deliberation over the options.
This was an unfortunate result of TPTB wanting to just get on with the action, because we all know that's what everyone's tuning in for, right?
no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 10:08 pm (UTC)On a good day, Atlantis engendered a strong feeling of complete disgust. These people weren't heroes in any sense of the word. But sure, characters like Zelenka were entertaining, and the actors tried their best to get around shitty writing and written characterization.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 07:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 10:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 11:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-22 01:40 am (UTC)ruinrun two shows at once again.They may very well have gotten a deal for Universe (for which they wanted a bigger budget) from MGM or some combo of sources that may or may not include Sci Fi, so Atlantis was a casualty.
Or it could simply be a casualty of the weak US dollar just not buying what it used to in Canada (which used to give SG-1 a budget boost after currency conversion), plus it's just doing "OK" in the ratings and for the money invested, they probably want a much bigger return.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 08:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 09:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-22 12:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 09:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 11:55 pm (UTC)By then they had already done some worrying things with Sam Carter, but hadn't completely destroyed her character yet. Looking back, it would have been for the best if SG1 was canned then.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-22 12:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-22 01:44 am (UTC)Also, ending at season five would have kept Sci Fi out of the picture as far as producing new stuff. I don't think they were as bad as some networks on making demands, but then the current Boyz at Bridge were giving them the great tasting generic sci fi they wanted.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 09:20 pm (UTC)I saw the appeal between John and Rodney, but never saw the electricity. I know others did.
I dunno: a show like Star Trek or Firefly or Farscape I can see the reason for a SAVE THE SHOW! campaign, but I get the feeling the decision for this was made a while ago.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 09:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 11:59 pm (UTC)Teyla and John are similar. Funny how when the writer has a nice scene where they are just friends it goes so well, whereas when they try to make it romantic, it looks awkward.
I sorta like Keller, but I strongly suspect it is because I have purposefully avoided Trio and Missing. I've come to learn to avoid episodes that are heavy on the "character development" of female characters on Stargate. As the Boys @ Bridge have proven that they haven't a clue.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 09:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 10:05 pm (UTC)I think it just boils down to Sci Fi not being willing to pay what MGM requested, and MGM blinked.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 10:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 10:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 10:18 pm (UTC)But I really like the Stargate and will miss it.