gategrrl: (Bhuddist Rock in Nepal)
[personal profile] gategrrl
When I joined the Book Club, I ordered all the Harry Dresden books they had, Anansi Boys by Neil Gaiman (which I bought ahead of time at the used bookstore in paperback form, oh well) and Temeraire by Naomi Novak. The only book I hadn't read already was Novak's book, and OMG.

This is the first book since the Dresden Files that I've *really* been enjoying the characters and story. Holy cow, it's the Complete and Total Buddy book. If the dragon were human, could things get any slashier? Granted, sometimes the plot moves along in a predictable manner, but because the characters are so likable, and the premise is so cool (dragons have existed for millenia on this parallel earth) and the Dragon Air Force of the early 1800s is such a unique creation for the era, I can't stop reading it.  I even switched from my little green leather purse to an older brown leather one I bought twelve years ago (!) in order to carry notebooks for writing. I stuffed the big hardcover book into the purse and read the book while I was at my daughter's Very Long Thinking Day Function yesterday.

It helps that I am also a fan of Jane Austen (like Novak) and a little bit of a history buff, although I'm not familiar with the Napoleonic era as much as I should be. There aren't so many stories out there that combine what I love about stories and story telling; this one packs a lot in. I'm not usually a fan of parallel earth stories, mostly because the writers don't think everything through. I'm wondering if Novak thought everything through with the Temeraire story: having air power through out history, and another intelligent, talking species to share the earth, would make some pretty drastic changes in the world view of the peoples of that earth. 

As long as Novak stays *away* from the Pern template with her Dragon Air Force I will be a happy camper. I liked *those* books back when I was in Junior High. I can see something of an Ideal Ayla type society developing if she isn't careful. What do I mean? Okay, if you've read the Valley of the Horse Books by Jean Auele then you're aware of the Super Tolerant and Peaceful and Ideal stone age civilization she dreamt up, in which people can travel from one end of the continent to the other via a vast system of tribal hospitality founded ages ago. No one is at war, crime is rare, if it's even recognized as such, and all is hunky dory.  

Fortunately, Novak has added a wrench into her AF Corp society via a legacy flyer who mistreats his dragon - and no one can seem to do anything about it in the way wife beaters seem to get away with abuse. It's nice to see there are some snakes in this paradise. - BUT it was pushing it with the concept of "free love" and human breeding with no attachments. That does seem anachronistic considering what *I* know of the era. When the main human character goes up to sleep with another female flyer, it was jarring. Why? Well, granted, he's a guy, BUT, much had been made of his own standards of sexual behavior. It's acknowledged right afterward that he thinks he's something of a hypcrite about it...but it felt more like a rationale band-aid. He may be a forward thinking guy, but I found it hard to believe this character wouldn't, somewhere in the back of his mind, be thinking that the woman he slept with, whether she's a captain higher up the food chain than him or not, is a slut. It's how he was raised - it's his background as a gentleman!  But I'll give it a pass because in all honesty, I only know this era through fiction and a few broadstroked history books.

I also wonder (while I'm reading it) if the dragons in the book survived to the present day. You know: there are so many species that humans found during that era (1800s) that are now extinct, and ancient tech (for example) that present day scientists are only now finding out about that I have to wonder about the development of human-flight via technology.

Okay, it's not a very coherent review, but it's morning, and I am currently drinking my test Trader's Joe Mocha Triple Esspresso. It's got three shots of espresso in it, and I'm trying to be careful: I don't want to zing! all day from this stuff.

Edited to correct Naomi Novak's first name...I'm such a dope!

Hi again

Date: 2007-02-27 12:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ndmzero.livejournal.com
Hey, I just recently read the trilogy -- I thought the author's name was Naomi, but whatever.

I agree - great story.

There's a link to the author's site on Amazon.

Did you know Peter Jackson (AKA LOTR Director) has optioned the movie rights?

There's more coming and so far it is great.

Enjoy -- this could be awesome.

Re: Hi again

Date: 2007-02-27 02:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gategrrl.livejournal.com
Whoops! You're right! I must have Kim Novak the actress on the brain or something - thank you for spotting that! I'll fix it. :-)

Date: 2007-02-27 03:14 am (UTC)
nialla: (Pern)
From: [personal profile] nialla
I've only read the first book in the series, and while I enjoyed it overall, I thought the "romance" angle was very forced and it jarred me out of the story too.

There just wasn't any real need for it and it felt like what I see in many historical genre romances -- "modernizing" history to fit our current mores and expectations.

Date: 2007-02-27 03:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gategrrl.livejournal.com
The other angle that I thought was anachronistic was how women were put in command of a dragon. Granted, some dragons would only accept to bond with a female human...but I really really can't see the men of that era allowing any woman to control a dragon - or if they were forced to, the woman would NOT be in command - she would be more of a caretaker/pet of the dragon, while the man would truly be in charge with the dragon.

But other wise, it's spot on.

Date: 2007-02-27 03:49 am (UTC)
nialla: (Pern)
From: [personal profile] nialla
I found it hard to believe that no one would realize that women were bonding with dragons, since they were such a curiosity for many. If you're going to do an AU of history, why not go ahead and have women who bond with dragons as a different "class" so to speak? Instead they're forced to hide what they really are from the public, and it would only take one person breaking the secrecy (male or female) for the ruse to fall apart.

Date: 2007-02-27 06:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gategrrl.livejournal.com
Well, Naomi did make a point of having all the men/officers on the ship be scared of being in the air corps - the air corps seemed to encourage a frightening wild-man, cave-like existence reputation with no real society available, etc etc.

And you *would* think, that once women were spotted onbaord some of the ships, that the sailors would take note of the sex of the captains of some of the dragons. BUT, those crews seemed to be specialized to deal with dragons. And the women dressed as men and had their hair dressed like men's; so I'd assume since sex roles and the way women and men dressed, it would be easier for a woman to get away with disguising herself as a man.

But yeah - as enjoyable as the possibility is, I'm not sure how thoroughly thought-through this aspect of the story was.

And with Eragon out, it's not surprising that such engaging characters in would attract that guy from New Zealand. ;-)

Profile

gategrrl

March 2017

S M T W T F S
   1234
5 67891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 10th, 2026 10:18 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios