Oct. 28th, 2005

In the arts, how "good" someone's work is strongly subjective. That's why some people think the Campbell Soup Can painting by Andy Warhol is the stupidist thing since the invention of Modernism, and others think it's the pinnacle of Modern Art, very sly and witty.

With actors and acting - it's apparent when someone is REALLY bad; they can't remember their lines, they feel like wood up on the stage/screen; their character doesn't *live*. It's also possible for a competent actor to move down a level, or a bad actor to improve.

So when two actors are compared, how is it possible to figure out who is the better/worse actor?

Are opinions based on Who I like Better? I like this actor's character better than that character's actor? I like what this one has done in the past better than what that person has done in the past? Or, I simply don't the fuck like this actor, and whatever he does is going to suck to me, cuz he's an ass and I'll never like him/her? or "My fandom politics dictate that I should hate this person's acting because."

How much Objectivity plays a role in your opinions? Or does it all?

So, when you say you don't like an actor/actress, WHY don't you like that actor/actress?

Profile

gategrrl

March 2017

S M T W T F S
   1234
5 67891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 8th, 2026 11:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios