[personal profile] gategrrl
Last night (late) the spouse and I flipped through cable channels, and I finally settled on a Showtime On Demand station. At the bottom of the list was the Gene Wilder version of Willy Wonka. It had been a long time since we'd seen it, and sans commercials and uncut (far as I know) so, on it went.

We fast forwarded through many of the musical numbers pre-chocolate factory. They're mostly by-the-numbers standard fare of the time, and don't progress the story much. As we watched, and saw Charlie's two sets of bedridden grandparents, I had to ask why they didn't even TRY to get off their asses and help contribute in some minor way to the household. It didn't endear grandpa Joe to me at all that he suddenly got the will to walk after twenty years -- all for a one day trip into Wonka's factory. I said to my husband that Charlie should have asked his hard-working MOTHER (the sole supporter of their family zoo) to go. But then he said, "His grandpa is his *buddy*!" Must be a guy thing.

There were a lot of scenes while the Golden Tickets are being found that were explicity directed at the adults at the movies -- there's a scene where a man is telling his psychotherapist that he'd had a dream about where he could find a ticket, and the therapist, who'd insisted before that dreams meant nothing (clearly not a Jungian) almost gripped the patient by the throat to just TELL him already! Hee. And then there was Charlie's science teacher played to perfection by some actor who was oily and yet, gee, he's still this kid inside as eager as the real kids are to find a Golden Ticket.

The movie, as delightful as it was before going into the Factory, picked up the moment Willy Wonka (Wilder) limps out along the red carper to welcome his guests. There's always a question in my mind of whether Wonka somehow arranged for those particular children to get the Golden Tickets, because of how on target his minion was, either always RIGHT THERE the moment the child got the ticket, or soon after. The movie never makes it clear *where* the Chocolate Factory is located, and that's appropriate, since it's a place where dreams are made, and the factory itself is a dream-like environment. Wilder imparts the right touch of menace and child-likeness, playfulness and coldness that is bewildering to the adults who come along for the ride; but the children themselves don't seem to notice or care -- they take his moods into stride -- he's one of them, although none of them really "gets" that except for the poorer than dirt Charlie. There's never any doubt that Charlie was the one intended to take over the Factory, of course, because in a fairy tale, the virtuous poor boy usually gets the gir -- er, Factory.

This time around with Willy, I adored the interplay between the two girls who go in the Factory -- Veruka and Violet. Violet is the ONLY person who tells selfish spoiled Veruka to "Can it!" and it's excellent psychology that the filmmakers/Raoul the writer that it HAD to be another girl who could tell Veruka to shut up about her wants. And sure enough, Veruka shut up, but glared Violet down. It was totally excellent.

I'm thinking this much about Willy Wonka (GW version) because of the preview for the new Johnny Depp version coming out soon. Holy SHIT. They've space=aged it. The Oompa=loompas wears solid colored clothing now, all shiny and blue and red (not a poofy pantaloon in sight, which is a good thing, I guess) and all the things in the factory now have a gunmetal high tech gleam to them. Gone are the Candy Colors of the Factory, and instead, it looks much the same as the dreary town outside its fence in the earlier film. Except it gleams. And has Johnny Depp with his face whited up with face paint (hubby says he looks like Michael Jackson) and hair cut into a page boy. THIS Willy is a creepy Willy. Depp is a masterful performer, and I'm sure he's going to put his own indelible mark on Willy Wonka. I don't know if I could trust any other actor to do that -- I only hope he doesn't make Willy too creepy, and keeps the sense of innocence in Wonka that was there in Wilder's version.

Methinks I'll have to pick up a copy of this book to read to the daughter at night.

Date: 2005-05-29 11:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brihana25.livejournal.com
Actually, I think I'm probably going to like what they did with the Oompa Loompas in the new one. The original orange-and-green frilly things scared the beejeezus out of me when I was little.

Actually... they still scare the beejeezus out of me...

Date: 2005-05-29 11:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gategrrl.livejournal.com
The Ooomp-Loomps look much more human this go-round, and if they ditched the green hair and strange outfits to do it, all the better. If I recall, in the book, they're a tribe in Africa that Willy Wonka saved (although it's never stated "they're from Africa"), so I'm guess that for the first film, they made sure to make the Ooompas as alien/dream-like as they could, in order to avoid some pretty horrendous stereotyping.

But I could be talking out my butt, since it's been years since I've read the book.

Date: 2005-05-30 12:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lovellama.livejournal.com
There is *so much chatter circling this movie. Is it a remake of the Gene Wilder movie? Or is it another movie version of the book? I have heard the screen writer for the Depp movie hadn't seen the Wilder version until after he had written the new version, and was very surprised at how darker the Wilder version was than his. I think alot of people have only seen the Wider movie and not read the book, and so even if the Depp version is closer to the book they won't be happy with this retelling. I liked the Oscar Wilde quotes they threw in the Wilder version, even though they weren't in the book. It will be interesting to see.

I'd also like to read how people felt about the Wilder movie when it first came out, how well they thought it kept to the book. :)

Date: 2005-05-30 01:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gategrrl.livejournal.com
Wow, I hadn't considered that the new movie wasn't based on the older one. Visually, from the bits I saw in the theater, the new film LOOKS darker (but shinier and techier) than the old one. I have a feeling that new film is heavily influenced by the modern sensibilities (as much as the old one was by the sensibilities of its day) of lots of SPFX, glittery zingies all over, and less character. However, seeing as the book was all *about* character and lack of, I'm not sure how that will pan out. Maybe they reedited it to fit the Harry Potter/Lemony Snicket crowd expectations.

I'm not even sure if the theme of the first film (the imagination is the thing) is even in the book.

After having watched it last night, I'm of the opinion that, corny music aside (the mother's song, grandpa Joe's song), this one is as much of a classic as The Wizard of Oz.

Profile

gategrrl

March 2017

S M T W T F S
   1234
5 67891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 7th, 2026 03:25 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios